Congress leader and Rajya Sabha MP Digvijaya Singh has so far maintained his political relevance by making controversial statements and not through work. The former Madhya Pradesh chief minister is known for sharing provocative views on sensitive topics that have often landed him in trouble. Sometimes, reportedly, he was even reprimanded by the high-command of the party but seems that made no difference.
Singh’s most recent jump into controversy was on Saturday when in a recent conversation with a Pakistan-based journalist on the Clubhouse app, he hinted at “relooking” the decision of revoking Article 370.
Let’s have a look at some of the controversial statements made by Digvijaya Singh that certainly made news:
June 2021
During the conversation with Shahzeb Jillani, a Pakistan-based journalist, Digvijaya said, “Democracy was not there in Kashmir when they revoked Article 370, ‘insaniyat’ was not there as they had put everyone behind bars. Meanwhile, ‘Kashmiriyat’ is something that is the fundamentals of secularism. Because in a Muslim-majority state there was a Hindu king and both worked together. In fact, the reservation in Kashmir was given to Kashmiri pandits, therefore, the decision of revoking Article 370 and reducing the statehood of J&K, is a sad decision. And the Congress party will certainly have to relook at this issue.”
The decision to revoke Article 370 was taken on August 5, 2019, by the Narendra Modi-led BJP government in a bid to integrate Jammu and Kashmir with India.
October 2019
He had reportedly said that the radicalisation of Hindus is as dangerous as radicalisation of Muslims. Referring to Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan’s 50-min lengthy speech at the UN General Assembly, he had said that it would be difficult for the nation in case there is ‘radicalisation of the majority,’ similar to that in Pakistan.
“The speech on radicalisation by Prime Minister Imran Khan (at UNGA) in which he speaks on Islamophobia and radical Muslims, the counter of that is radicalisation of Hindus. The radicalisation of Hindus is equally dangerous to the radicalisation of Muslims. Jawaharlal Nehru had said, communalism of the majority is more dangerous than the communalism of the minority. Today, the situation in Pakistan where there is a communalisation of the majority, if that happens in India it will not be easy to save the nation then,” Republic had quoted Singh as saying.
September 2019
Digvijaya Singh had once said that some saffron-clad people were indulging in selling churan and committing rapes by defaming the Sanatan Dharma. While addressing a Sant Samagam (gathering of saints) organised by the Congress government in Madhya Pradesh’s Bhopal, he had said, “Saffron-clad people are selling churan, (some) saffron-clad are committing rapes, rapes are taking place in temples. Is it our religion? God will not pardon those who have defamed our sanatan dharma.”
#WATCH Digvijaya Singh, Congress in Bhopal: Today, people are wearing saffron clothes and raping, rapes are happening inside temples, is this our religion? Those who have defamed our ‘Sanatan Dharma’, not even god will forgive them. pic.twitter.com/psAQcd1R7p— ANI (@ANI) September 17, 2019
June 2019
Singh had accused the BJP and the Bajrang Dal of taking money from Pakistan’s spy agency ISI. “Bajrang Dal (the youth wing of Vishwa Hindu Parishad) and Bharatiya Janata Party are taking money from the ISI. Attention should be paid to this,” he had said.
The Congress leader had also gave a communal dimension to his claim. “Non-Muslims are spying for Pakistan’s ISI more than Muslims. This should be understood,” he added.
May 2017
On May 1, 2017, Singh had stroked controversy by claiming that the Telangana police has set up a “bogus” ISIS website to radicalise Muslim youth and encourage them to join the terrorist outfit. “Telangana Police has set up a bogus ISIS site which is radicalising Muslim Youths and encouraging them to become ISIS Modules,” he had tweeted. Telangana police had later filed a case against the Congress leader.
Telangana Police has set up a bogus ISIS site which is radicalising Muslim Youths and encouraging them to become ISIS Modules.— digvijaya singh (@digvijaya_28) May 1, 2017
August 2016
Singh once referred Pakistan-Occupied- Kashmir (PoK) as India-Occupied-Kashmir. However, he later clarified that he meant to say PoK and that “Kashmir is an integral part of India.” He has also once referred terrorists Osama bin Laden as “Osamaji” and Hafiz Saeed as “saheb”.
July 2015
Singh had in 2015 stoked controversy by saying, in a series of tweets, that the credibility of government and judiciary was at stake after the “urgency” shown in 1993 Mumbai serial blasts convict Yakub Memon’s case. “Yakub Memon hanged. Exemplary urgency and commitment has been shown by Govt and Judiciary in punishing an accused of Terror. I hope similar commitment of Govt and Judiciary would be shown in all cases of terror irrespective of their caste creed and religion,” he had said.
“I have my doubts the way the cases of other Terror accused are being conducted. Let’s see. Credibility of the Govt and Judiciary is at stake,” Singh added.
July 2013
Singh had alleged that Sangh trains its activists in making bombs. Speaking to reporters, he had sad that he has video clips of four VHP and RSS activists accepting that they were trained by Sangh in making bombs.
July 2013
He had said that he would not apologise to BJP over his remark that the Batla House encounter was fake. “I will never apologise. I still maintain that encounter was fake,” he had told reporters. This statement invited reactions from different political parties.
July 2013
The Congress leader had posted a controversial tweet on former BJP minister Raghavji. He had mentioned “Ram and Raghavji” and it was written a few days after Raghavji was arrested following allegation of sexual assault levelled by his servant.
Slogans being raised in Bhopal : Bachcha Bachcha Ram Ka, Raghavji Ke Kaam Ka !— digvijaya singh (@digvijaya_28) July 10, 2013
January 2011
Singh had claimed that hours before 26/11 attacks, slain Mumbai top cop Hemant Karkare had called him to say his life was under threat. “I had spoken to him three and a half hours…it was between 6 and 7 PM on 26/11….I was very shocked when I came to know that he was killed,” he had said.
Read all the Latest News, Breaking News and Coronavirus News here
